Friday, April 29, 2016

Drexel Woodson

Farewell to Sidney Wilfred Mintz (1922-2015)—Teacher, Mentor, and Friend

I’ve done this to honor Sid before.1 Today, my grief over his passing is too fresh, raw, and intense to do it the first way again. We chatted by phone for 15 minutes on Wednesday, 16 December 2015, 12 days before Sid left this world. That was when I, still insouciant he hinted, called “just” a month late to wish him a happy 93rd birthday.2 Sid was in fine form, his voice strong, and his comments sharp, insightful, and carefully articulated. He advised me to accept the fact that age had made me wise, as it sometimes does for humans. He also mentioned sending proof corrections for his last publication to the publisher, and expressed delight about a 2016 trip to Río Piedras, Puerto Rico, where La Universidad de Puerto Rico would inaugurate the Sidney W. Mintz Collection, books and article reprints donated more than a decade earlier to a reputable institution on the island where he had first done anthropological fieldwork in 1948. Then, he briefly commented on the 2015 phase of a bizarre US American presidential campaign and other worldly affairs. Last and in habitual fashion, Sid cracked jokes and took potshots at unnamed “other bastards” he had survived.

I knew Sid for 46 years. In September 1969, I laid eyes on him in “Anthro 20,” a four-field introduction to anthropology for Yale University undergraduates. The award-winning course that he had by then taught for 18 years was my first anthropology course. We met after class one November day and began weekly chats, usually over beers. Sid became my undergraduate advisor, inspiring and shaping my interest in anthropology, especially the cultural/social kind, as a discipline and profession until graduation in 1973. While I slugged through graduate work at The University of Chicago (1974-1979), and labored over a dissertation project that took ten years to research and write up, Sid was my steadfast extramural mentor.

Sid’s mentorship continued after my academic career at the University of Arizona got underway in 1990. By then, I’d started calling him “Teach.” He graciously wrote a 1998 letter of recommendation that helped me jump the Continuing Status hurdle (a variant of the US American Academy’s Tenure and Promotion ordeal). Sid’s letter was unusually strong administrators tell me, a unexpected development during my months of high anxiety, given doubts he’d expressed about writing for someone whose faculty portfolio did not prioritize the classroom teaching he thoroughly enjoyed and did so well.

Over the years, Sid enthusiastically played his role as senior partner in our regular conversations—face-to-face and by phone, or virtual by snail mail and email. We talked shop and shop talk sometimes provoked heated arguments about anthropology (the discipline and the profession), about the Caribbean Region (in/for itself and on the world stage), and about Haiti (present and past) and Haitians (peasants and non-peasants, Blacks and Mulattos, market women and producers or consumers). Anchoring the conversations were our contrasting views of how, as anthropologists, to think about complex relations among human inventions and, as men, to act in social and political-economic provinces of the world human inventions created and humans could change. Culture topped the invention inventory, of course, but closely following it were race/ethnicity, color (the main somatic marker of identity in “certain cultures”), class, citizenship/nationality, gender, and power. Our arguments usually turned on whether one could or should rank material conditions and symbolic considerations as “forces” shaping the ways of this world, exhibiting at once stunning diversity and surprising unity. Often enough, we agreed to disagree about matters of principle (materialism versus realism, for instance) and the interpretation of facts.

Sid often summarized his appraisal of an anthropologist’s or historian’s work, or a politician’s or pundit’s positions on public issues by quipping, “He [or she] can’t tell the difference between hotdogs and filet mignon.” I sometimes agreed with the reasons for Sid’s appraisals, but usually poked fun at his quip by counter-quipping, “Certain occasions call for hotdogs rather than filet mignon.” Watching US American baseball, football, or basketball games were examples, I would remind him, unless spectators watched games in odd yet nonetheless profoundly US American places like Los Angeles. Sid didn’t budge; nor did I.

Riffing on Sid’s dictum and frequent observations about the quasi-capitalism of Haiti or the Haitian peasantry, I offer a quasi-recipe:

Boil, grill, or, roast a hotdog (preferably the Hebrew National brand) and heat a bun with the proper consistency and saltiness with semi-sweet undertones. Slather the hotdog, minimally, with sauerkraut, raw onion (diced), mustard, and relish. But, if your taste buds demand it, add catsup. Eat with gusto but slowly to avoid choking and to accommodate intermittent sips of your favorite beverage: beer, soda, water or, yes Sid, fine French wine. All the while, reflect on when, where, and how enjoying a hotdog is the culturally appropriate thing—hell, the right thing—to do.

Haitian market women might say, Vwayaje dousman nan peyi san chapo-a, Msyè Sid! (Travel sweet in the country without hats [i.e., easily and comfortably in the afterlife], Mr. Sid!) Farewell, Sid! Hard work during your long life produced sweet fruit in this world and, touching many people’s lives, you made a difference. I wish you every last good thing in the next world, if such a world exists, contrary to our agnostic beliefs. I will miss you, “Teach,” more than these words or any others can convey.

NOTES

1 Drexel G. Woodson, “Hoecakes, Cultural Anthropology, and One Black American’s World: Birthday Greetings to Sidney Wilfred Mintz, Teacher and Friend.” Invited essay for a special book of recipes and reminiscences assembled by Elizabeth C. Dunn (University of Colorado), Elizabeth Emma Ferry (Queens College, CUNY) and Katherine Verdery (University of Michigan) for presentation to Sidney W. Mintz at the session, “Recuperating the Material: Papers in Honor of Sidney W. Mintz.” One Hundred and First Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association: “(Un)Imaginable Futures: Anthropology Faces the Next 100 Years,” New Orleans, LA, 20-24 November 2002. 15 August 2002. MS, 8 pp. Available online at http://www.sidneymintz.net/recipes/texts/woodson.php (accessed 30 March 2016).


2 Sid used the French adjective insouciant (usually “carefree,” but sometimes “careless”) in a 1972 letter of introduction to his friend Albert Mangonès (1917-2002), the internationally-renowned Haitian architect and sculptor, to characterize Ira Lowenthal and me. We were fledgling Haitianists about to catalog the Edmond Mangonès Collection, Albert’s father’s extraordinary library, for Yale University’s Antilles Research Program, which Sid directed. (See Ira P. Lowenthal et Drexel G. Woodson [rédacteurs], Catalogue de la Collection Mangonès, Pétionville, Haïti. ARP Occasional Papers, 2. New Haven, CT: Antilles Research Program, Yale University, 1974.)